Asked Ford to its 75,000 unioned workers. That is an impressive number of people to ask to leave voluntarily. I admire that Ford and GM are doing what they can to shift with the times, but it still doesn’t change the fact that they seem to be a long way from “getting” it.
I have come to seriously despise the fact that GM feels it necessary to take the same frame and drivetrain and send that platfrom to different car brands. Case in pIoint: Pontiac is said to have a “new” G5 for 2007. That’s odd, as it looks just like the coupe version of the Chevy Cobalt - pointless? Seems to be. I admit that I may be lacking some knowledge in some basic financial practices and theories. It still doesn’t seem logical. It certainly isn’t innovative. What it does is tell me that you can make a different body and interior for the essentially the same car. While that may interest some, it is a deterrent for me.
Now, I understand that many companies do the same thing. Honda does it with Acura, Volkswagen and Porsche do it, etc. Still, they seem to make some effort to better distinguish the two. When the Ford Fusion and the Mercury Milan look almost identical, minus front grille and tail-lights, you have to wonder about Ford’s ability to make cars that stand out. That and they, like GM are behind on the Hybrid game - GM is busy making Hummers while Honda and Toyota are rolling out 40MPG Accords and Camry’s.
Ford needs to focus on Ford - quit bringing your sedans over to your sibling companies. Make better cars for Ford first. I’d just assume never see Mercury “make” a car again. It’s turned into a rather pointless brand. All this said, I’ll reiterate that it is good to see Ford adapting to change and speeding up their plan to turn the company around. I could really careless what GM does as I’ve given up on that company years ago - as long as the release the new Camaro and keep making the Corvette 